LOL... you're not getting it. Ask yourself, "what is a RF designed for"? Ask yourself what camera design gives that to you, and what doesn't? There's really only one.
If you agree with me 100%, you understand RF photography, 100%
If you agree with me 50%, you understand RF photography, 50%
If you disagree with me 100%, you don't understand it at all, and probably just like collecting gear.
Or, you're just "offended"... Your photographic "world view" has been shaken to the core, and you're reacting like so many 17th century "Cardinal Bellarmine's" ordering Galileo not to "hold or defend" that the Earth moves and the Sun stands still at the centre.
This is a maximize/minimize problem, almost like linear algebra or simple algebraic matrices. What camera, by design, maximizes creative control and, by design, minimizes the amount of time it takes to compose and shoot reaqured for RF-style photography? It has to be "aperture priority" design with a master/slave relationship between aperture and shutter speed (respectively). It has to be a manual focus, RF-designed camera (no mirror) with a sub-f2 lens, and ability to rate film up to 1000 asa, with a top-plate metering capability so's to pre-meter. No other camera ever made meets these requirements. Furthermore, either the aperture or the shutter must be stepless for perfect metering.
In use, say you're in a room, you premeter using the under/over lights on the top plate to get your stop-range for that particular environment. You select the aperture within that range for the aesthetic you want. Focus, fire, with the highest probability of capturing the decisive moment, with the greatest amount of aesthetic control.
Only the Electro series, the GSN in particular, enables you to achieve this. It's thE only design.
As evidence, Karen Nakamura rates the "GX" as the best rangefinder - period, on her site, and she's a gearhead if ever there was one. She rates the GSN as the best rangefinder "under $100". However, I think this qualifier shows her bias toward more expensive gear and smaller cameras...
... and like most/many of you, are unwilling to admit what any fool can plainly see, that the Electro outperforms, by a wide margin, gear that is far more expensive because it is engineered and designed better with a brilliant use of automation. You are biased too, that a camera that costs 1/10th of what you might own - or more, is a far better tool for the style of photography you allege to be your passion.
I dub you all "Cardinal Bellarmine" -s.
|