RanceEric
The name is Rance
This is Aiden. at Rittenhouse Square.. This kid is adorable!!
Feedback would be much appreciated!
(taken with Nikon SP with 5cm f/1.4)
Aiden in the Park on flickr
Dancing Aiden on flickr
Aiden in the Fountain on flickr
Feedback would be much appreciated!
(taken with Nikon SP with 5cm f/1.4)
Aiden in the Park on flickr

Dancing Aiden on flickr

Aiden in the Fountain on flickr

Jockos
Well-known
I think picture no.2 should be left out.
The other three has fairly unison color setting, but the second is like a nail in the eye to me. It's a good shot, but I'd rather not see it together with the others, or maybe if you place it as number one/four, it won't stand out as much.
The other three has fairly unison color setting, but the second is like a nail in the eye to me. It's a good shot, but I'd rather not see it together with the others, or maybe if you place it as number one/four, it won't stand out as much.
RanceEric
The name is Rance
I think picture no.2 should be left out.
The other three has fairly unison color setting, but the second is like a nail in the eye to me. It's a good shot, but I'd rather not see it together with the others, or maybe if you place it as number one/four, it won't stand out as much.
I agree, actually. It's funny that that's the only one of the photos taken with a different camera, and it's obvious. Thanks for the input! I think it is best just left out of the group..
forsakenrider
Salad
Great shots! I like the use of DOF and movement in the first.
The only criticism I can give is what my teacher said in class. Photos of peoples backs or people looking out of the frame often cause ones eye to travel to the edge of the frame or out of it completely and move on. That was his opinion, and its something I think about often now. But I feel if composed correctly, a series of images of the same person with no face can still be interesting.
But I could be way off, just thoughts after all.
The only criticism I can give is what my teacher said in class. Photos of peoples backs or people looking out of the frame often cause ones eye to travel to the edge of the frame or out of it completely and move on. That was his opinion, and its something I think about often now. But I feel if composed correctly, a series of images of the same person with no face can still be interesting.
But I could be way off, just thoughts after all.
I think #1 is the keeper... that's special.
RanceEric
The name is Rance
I think #1 is the keeper... that's special.
Thank you! I love that shot.. very happy with it
There are a few others;
Holding Hands on flickr

On the Wall on flickr

At the Fountain on flickr

RanceEric
The name is Rance
But I don't know how I feel about these three with the first images..
Still #1 is the keeper. The hat, lack of face, and the hopscotch court coupled with the shallow depth of field bring that photo beyond the cute kid photo territory. The rest of them I'm sure the parents would love though.
Vics
Veteran
I like no. three in the first post. I never saw four pics...
dogbunny
Registered Boozer
#2, I think could have been saved with a little exposure compensation. There could have been a little more detail in the contour of his body on the left side. As they are, I agree that #1 is the keeper. Nice color.
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.