ScottAlexander
Street Photographer
It's a historical relic, regardless of affiliation. It should have gone to a museum, in my opinion. A lot of them would have paid you a fair value for it as well.
Hmm, if it's been obliterated, fine, I would not have it restored or anything like that, but I can't go along with destroying historical artefacts because they represent something terrible. I'd hate to think that if an old slave ship was discovered, that it would immediately be scuttled simply because it's purpose was barbaric.
I get the sentiment, but history is history, and generally I think we should strive to preserve it, and not just the pleasant stuff.
One in three of all immigrants, over the last 150 years (US immigration statistics, which I learned to my surprise on Ellis Island). If you lived outside the USA, you might hear of many more who have left, including many born in the USA. Married to an American expatriate (which is NOT the same as an ex-patriot), I probably tend to meet/notice more than most people. In our small village in France (maybe 1000 people) I know two US-born emigrées (NY State and Texas) and two who immigrated and left (France and the UK).. . . More want to live here but I hear of very few who permanently leave.. . .
I`d have to say no too.
Roger has a point, Stalin was a killer and yet people still collect Feds and Zorki cameras.
There just cameras.
Hi Roger!
Nice to hear from you!
You probably wouldn't want to live in Minnesota in January! But it's a wee bit warmer of late---global warming?
Yes, you are correct, there are many fine countries on earth to reside. Sound like you live in a beautiful place! How about having a few of us photographer aficionados "invade" your city and saunter around making photographs sometime?
Have a wonderful week!
Creepiness is a state of mind, not a property of an innate object.
Well said.As a Jew, and someone with a personal connection to some awfull events that occurred in the period of time in question, I would probably keep such a camera and use it.
This is partly because I love cameras and I do not blame an inanimate instrument for how it might have been/was used, and partly because I would likely get a private kick occasionally thinking that my people and religion and ideas live on, whilst the regime that tried to destroy it is gone.
Creepiness is a state of mind, not a property of an innate object.
I don't think Pastor Chris is averse to owning a Leica on account of it being made in Germany. I believe he finds it creepy to own one that was purchased by the German military during the time of the holocaust, and during the time when Germany was an enemy of the USA and the allied forces. After all, he did later acquire a IIIc with no German military markings, and feels OK about it.
I feel the same way. I am fond of the IIIc, and own three of them, including one that is a "stepper" (i.e. has the "bump" Chris mentioned). But I would not care to own one that was purchased by the German Military during those years. I wouldn't even want one in my house. I have no negative feelings about the Leitz company, for reasons mentioned above: they were obviously not anti-semitic, and were also not nazi sympathizers. They were simply forced to consign some of the camera production to the government.
Fascinating discussion! Wow I didn't know Leitz is up there with Wallenberg and Shindler in terms of using their situation to save lives. I certainly can understand why one wouldn't feel right using a camera with such a history but I also like the concept of taking something that was used for evil and using it for good. After all a camera has no good or bad on it's own.