If you could go anywhere and photograph for 2 weeks, where would you go?

Somewhere really obscure ... maybe mix it with some reclusive hilltop tribe in Papua New Guinea or possibly Borneo. Somewhere where Coca Cola, Levis and mobile phones don't exist and the nearest MacDonalds is a plane flight away.
 
Italy! From Rome northwards. My second choice would be France ( all of it :) ) and then Prague. You Europeans are so lucky for any number of reasons...
 
If I could get 2 weeks to spend just taking photos, then I wouldn't really care where to go or what to shoot. If I only could get 2 weeks... ;))
 
Cape Canaveral, to board the mother ship for that "one of a kind" view.

I could dig that kind of macro photography.
 
Last edited:
I've got a long list....... 2 weeks each will be great....... India; Dhaka,Bangladesh; Vietnam; Krunthep Mahanakorn, Thailand; Batavia, Indonesia; Luang Phrabang, Laos; Angkor Wat, Cambodia....... well, can always wish.
 
For me it's definitely the Leatham Conservation Area in New Zealands South Island. I spent a week in there in Dec-Jan as part of a 13 day hike earlier this year. At the very start of the trip whilst attempting to cross the flodded 6 Mile Creek I was swept down the river and in the process destroyed my Leica M6ttl (the quotes I've had to repair it are more than it cost brand new). This was one of the best hikes I've ever done in NZ dating back to 1974 and I didn't bring back one image.
 
Vietnam, and back to the Philippines. Japan, and Ireland. but if I had to choose one, it would be the Philippines.
 
Tough one...three way tie so I'm awarding 2 weeks in each location:
#1 Iceland
#2 Northern Japan
#3 Tierra Del Fuego/Patagonia

Bob
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom