versatility in your camera bag

Different people may have different ways to "best" pack a camera bag for photography. I would not get into setting guidelines on what equipment to pack.

Hi Raid. I think I made it pretty clear that this worked for me, and I was interested in the alternate views of others, not that my way of packing was a guideline for others.
 
This, to me, is the real key to the question -- EXPECTING. I tend to think first before selecting a camera. My orientation is to think "singular" when packing a camera but ensuring that it will largely be a good choice for the kind of shooting I EXPECT to do.

Sometimes there are surprises, but I've never felt hobbled with a poor choice... except when packing only LF gear and then finding some fast action that would be nice to photograph. In that situation I rely on my photographic memory to have a perpetual recollection of the event. 😉

I felt that I needed the Hexar AF for unobtrusive people photography (relatives in their houses), but I would not be satisfied with the Hexar AF when doing relaxed contemplative photography, say of the 1950's tractor and other abandoned farm machinery that I often photograph in different lighting and weather conditions. For that, I wanted the the Nikon SLR.

Sorry, I don't mean to sound defensive, just explaining my choices.
 
For me, versatility is one camera (or two similar/identical) cameras that I can use quickly, without thinking, and without hsving to decide what camera to use. Four incompatible 35mm cameras would be less versatile for me, though I might consider Leicas plus medium format.

Cheers,

R.
 
I felt that I needed the Hexar AF for unobtrusive people photography (relatives in their houses), but I would not be satisfied with the Hexar AF when doing relaxed contemplative photography, say of the 1950's tractor and other abandoned farm machinery that I often photograph in different lighting and weather conditions. For that, I wanted the the Nikon SLR.

Sorry, I don't mean to sound defensive, just explaining my choices.


Frank,

It actually sounds fine. A plan is just that. To go without a plan is a default plan for potential problems and/or disaster/regret. Now, if you were to hang all three cameras around your neck, then I suspect you might have a problem but your plan allows you to pick and choose for each task or fun time as you see fit.🙂🙂🙂
 
It seems that most responders so far pack in a more focused manner, while I am packing more of a variety of tools for a variety of situations.

I know that for myself, I enjoy variety.
 
For me, versatility is one camera (or two similar/identical) cameras that I can use quickly, without thinking, and without hsving to decide what camera to use. Four incompatible 35mm cameras would be less versatile for me, though I might consider Leicas plus medium format.

Cheers,

R.


Oh, how I wish I could have two or three M bodies with various lenses.😱 THAT is a plan that seems to be the dream plan. Partly because it makes so much sense but also because I simply can't afford to buy that much M gear at the moment. But, someday....😀
 
Sorry, I don't mean to sound defensive, just explaining my choices.

You haven't been defensive at all. If I may whisper... when I really want versatility I take a 35mm SLR (Nikon) and a bag of lenses . But that's just me.
 
Last edited:
I should really do some scanning of negs in order to share some of these results on line, but I sooo dislike scanning. Also, I do not necessarily like sharing images without discretion all over the internet. My photography is for myself and those close to me.
 
Last edited:
I should really do some scanning of negs in order to share some of these results on line, but I sooo dislike scanning. Also, I do not necessarily like sharing images without discretion all over the internet. My photography is for myself and those close to me.


Hey, same here! Hate scanning but wish I had a scanner. Post very few images for the same reason.

Otoh, I shoot some images just to share because it may be an experiment that has an interesting result or it is just plain fun.
 
Hi Raid. I think I made it pretty clear that this worked for me, and I was interested in the alternate views of others, not that my way of packing was a guideline for others.

Frank,
I was not referring to what you have said here but to what I was going to say ... I meant to say that I am not setting any guidelines. :angel:
 
Difference in how I pack my camera bag, lies in whether I'm shooting for me, or a gig for someone else. If the former, I'm happy with whichever of my film cameras catches my eye, and no more than one prime lens usually. If the latter, I shoot with a dslr and a zoom that covers focal lengths from 24mm-135mm, with a fast prime to be used if needed.

From what I can see people vary wildly on this one, with most preferring the choice and flexibility of a kit to cover most eventualities, or else preferring the liberation of a simple, spartan setup.

I fall into the second category, preferring a spartan setup, with my personal shooting being an extension of where I am & capturing that. I tried the bag of kit approach, and a lens covering most focal lengths, but it didn't fit my shooting style.

Different strokes for different folks, I guess..
 
Great post and thread, Frank.

Versatility is the key to me.

I use the R3A on my wrist with 28 3.5 at f/8 for most soft light scenes. A Leica IIIF with 50 3.5 at f/8 for direct sun (left jacket pocket) and the Hexar AF for real low light (right jacket pocket). Usually my XA inside my left pants pocket (in case I prefer not to be seen with a bigger camera) and my compact stylus epic 28-100 in case I need to stay away from the subject (right pants pocket). I carry no bag. Sometimes a Coronel Tapioca photo vest. I use the vest especially if I plan to do portraiture, so I throw the 90 Summicron in. All this is light enough to me even for hours of walking, and everything's in a precise place I already know, so I enjoy it this way, and can act faster than with a bag. I don't carry too much film: apart from what's inside my cameras, maybe two or three rolls. I have never found more than 100 good situations the same day...

Cheers,

Juan
 
My typical film kit includes an M3 with 50'cron (mounted) and 35'cron + a SWC with two A12 backs for wide. A L308 handheld meter to measure light. All of this fits comfortably in a standard Hadley with room to spare for film.

If I need to focus up close then I replace the M3 with a Pentax MX with 50 or 55mm lens.

GF1 + 20 and 14 as backup occasionally - in which case I also bring M/u43 and an M42/i43 adapters. This gives me 21mm on the wide end and up to 100mm with a 50mm mounted on GF1 for portraits.

Having said that, I typically only take one camera and lens unless it's a photo related outing.
 
Last edited:
For me it really depends on whither I've schedule a shoot with someone in which case I bring my Bronica SLR kit + Either my M6 or M8 plus a couple of lens and possibly my Zeiss 533/16

Bare bones walk around M8 or M6 with 35mm + 50mm or 15mm in jeans pocket with extra film/SD cards/Battery

Lightweight Bag Tarmac shoulder bag with M8 and M6 each with a 35mm lens on them plus a 50mm and 15mm along with extra film/SD cards/Battery


If I'm flying someplace I pack my Leica gear along with my Laptop and film in my carry-on bag and place my Tripod and MF gear in my checked bag.

For me versatility has more to do with using different formats rather then using focal length lens.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom